Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Applied Research: Post-Budget Address By Minister Goodyear ...

Minister of State for Science and Technology and the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario Gary Goodyear addressed the Economic Club this morning in a post-budget speech outlining Canada's approach to fostering greater business innovation. Minister Goodyear opened with a reminder that, while Canada is doing well?economically, "we are facing?competition?from emerging, fast-growing economies." The entrepreneur is the?driving?force?behind the economy, and supporting business innovation is a priority emerging from Budget 2012, as I outlined in my last post. While Canada is first in HERD in the G7, Minister Goodyear reminded the audience that "results matter more than rank".?
(As an aside, the person I was sitting next to reported hearing on the radio this week that Canada is #2 in HERD; 19th in BERD. If true, this is worse than last year.) This is the well known refrain of how Canada lags in business?investment?in R&D. The new funding?announced?in Budget 2012 retains our world leading research?spending?(HERD), while focusing new money on fostering greater industry-academic partnerships and business investments in R&D and innovation. This is exactly what?Canada?needs.
James Bradshaw, in a Globe and Mail article last Friday, quoted me (and others) in support of the Budget, which I said was??good for competitiveness and good for productivity.?The big message here is that the federal government is focusing its innovation efforts on the private sector, and that?s something that?s sorely needed in this country,? Dr. Luke said. ?We need to be a world-leading applied research and commercialization country. That?s where this budget is heading us to.? Canada's approach to business innovation is in keeping with?Bank of Canada Marc Carney's speech on "Exporting in a Post Crisis World." Carney outlines the need for Canada to update our approach to international markets, signalling a shift that will see "Canadian businesses retooling and reorienting to the new global economy." Currently we are?"concentrated in slow-growing advanced economies, particularly the United States, rather than fast-growing emerging markets." This was the point?Minister?Goodyear made this morning, and it relates very well to the concept of a soft landing in international markets, which I outlined just over a year ago. That is, educational?institutions?like George?Brown?College are working with our?international?education partners to provide our entrepreneurs and industry partners with connections to global markets. Our international partners can connect industry to their markets, working with us to adapt and adopt (adoptation) technologies to the realities of place within each locality. Not only can we work together to?internationalize?education, but we can work toward engaging our industry directly in providing entrance to new, emerging markets. And that's good for Canadian competitiveness and productivity.

michelle obama adam lambert arrested shroud of turin barkley beltran space ball jim mora

FACT CHECK: Obama's incomplete history lesson

President Barack Obama speaks at The Associated Press luncheon during the ASNE Convention, Tuesday, April 3, 2012, in Washington. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

President Barack Obama speaks at The Associated Press luncheon during the ASNE Convention, Tuesday, April 3, 2012, in Washington. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

President Barack Obama waves as he leaves The Associated Press luncheon during the ASNE Convention, Tuesday, April 3, 2012, in Washington. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

President Barack Obama speaks at The Associated Press luncheon during the ASNE Convention in Washington, Tuesday, April, 3, 2012. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

(AP) ? Few would quarrel with President Barack Obama's point that the Republican Party has drifted to the right in recent years, disavowing ideas it once embraced ? even created. But making that case in a major campaign speech, Obama ignored realities in his own Democratic ranks.

For one, it was opposition from coal-state Democrats that sank cap-and-trade legislation to control greenhouse gas emissions, not just from those arch-conservative Republicans.

For another, if Republicans have moved to the right on health care, it's also true that Obama has moved to the left. He strenuously opposed a mandate forcing people to obtain health insurance until he won office and changed his mind.

Obama's speech to news executives Tuesday at the annual meeting of The Associated Press was perhaps his most aggressive dressing down of the Republicans yet this campaign season. Mitt Romney, his likely GOP rival for the presidency, speaks to news leaders Wednesday.

Several points in Obama's address gave an incomplete accounting to his audience. Here are some of his statements and how they compare with the facts:

___

OBAMA: "You'd think they'd say: 'You know what? Maybe some rules and regulations are necessary to protect the economy and prevent people from being taken advantage of by insurance companies or credit card companies or mortgage lenders.'"

THE FACTS: As zealous as they sound on the subject, Republicans aren't proposing to throw out all regulations. Romney, for one, proposes changing, but not repealing, the Sarbanes-Oxley law that tightened accounting regulations in response to corporate scandals. He does want to repeal the Dodd-Frank law toughening financial-industry regulations after the meltdown in that sector, and he wants environmental rules loosened to spur energy production.

Even in the heat of GOP primaries, however, Romney wasn't talking about throwing out the federal rulebook. "We don't want to tell the world that Republicans are against all regulation," he said. "No, regulation is necessary to make a free market work. But it has to be updated and modern."

___

OBAMA: "Cap and trade was originally proposed by conservatives and Republicans as a market-based solution to solving environmental problems. The first president to talk about cap and trade was George H.W. Bush. Now you've got the other party essentially saying we shouldn't even be thinking about environmental protection; let's gut the EPA."

THE FACTS: Obama is right that cap and trade was a Republican idea ? first put in place to control sulfur dioxide emissions, or acid rain, under the 1990 Clean Air Act amendments that passed overwhelmingly. The idea is to cap overall emissions of a certain pollutant while letting companies trade pollution allowances, essentially using a combination of the government and private market to make the environment cleaner.

But in recent years, cap and trade failed when Democrats controlled the Senate and the House. Moreover, Republicans argued the legislation was not a truly market-driven mechanism. It would have auctioned off pollution allowances to companies, raising money for the government to help offset higher energy bills and invest in cleaner energy technologies.

They wanted a system that would distribute the allowances for free, letting the private market determine their value. That's how it worked with acid rain.

Republicans have not abandoned the notion of environmental protection, although the presidential primary rhetoric ? all geared to more drilling and energy production ? could lead one to think so.

___

OBAMA: "There is a reason why there's a little bit of confusion in the Republican primary about health care and the individual mandate, since it originated as a conservative idea to preserve the private marketplace in health care while still assuring that everybody got coverage, in contrast to a single-payer plan. Now suddenly this is some socialist overreach."

THE FACTS: Again, true. But not the whole story.

Many Republicans into the 1990s, and in some cases beyond, supported the idea of requiring people to have health insurance, even if they disagreed with Democrats on how universal coverage should work. Now that idea is decidedly purged from the GOP mainstream.

But until he became president, Obama, too, thought a mandate was a bad idea. In the 2008 campaign, it was his "core belief" that everyone would get health insurance, without the coercion of a mandate, if only high-quality coverage were affordable.

He relentlessly criticized his primary opponent Hillary Rodham Clinton in debates, speeches, ads and mailers for proposing a mandate, taking it so far that she waved one of his mailers in the air and barked, "Shame on you, Barack Obama," slamming "your tactics and your behavior in this campaign."

___

OBAMA: "At the beginning of the last decade, the wealthiest Americans received a huge tax cut in 2001 and another huge tax cut in 2003. We were promised that these tax cuts would lead to faster job growth. They did not. The wealthy got wealthier. We would expect that. The income of the top 1 percent has grown by more than 275 percent over the last few decades to an average of $1.3 million a year. But prosperity sure didn't trickle down."

THE FACTS: You wouldn't know from his statement that taxes in 2001 and 2003 were cut across the board, not just for the wealthy. President George W. Bush's package trimmed rates for all taxable income levels, doubled the child tax credit and substantially raised the amount of money people can put in individual retirement accounts. The political fight these days is over whether to keep extending the tax cuts for the wealthiest. Obama supports keeping the lower rates for the rest and has pushed similar tax cuts of his own ? excluding the wealthiest, however.

___

Associated Press writers Dina Cappiello and Tom Raum contributed to this report.

Associated Press

heaven is for real chapter 11 bankruptcy chapter 11 bankruptcy big ten acc challenge 2011 john wayne gacy amr jack del rio fired

Finding Transcendence in a Transactional Life - Keith Jennings ...

Everyday life is crazy busy.

Go here.? Go there.? Do this.? Do that.

My wife and I feel so rushed at times we feel like we?re running late in running late!

Our lives are transactional.

They are a portfolio of things to do, places to be and people to engage.

And this constant going makes us feel disconnected.? From ourselves.? From others.? From our surroundings.? From God.

I believe the reason the creative is so potent in our lives is due to its unique ability to transcend the transactional nature of our lives.

The creative elevates us.? It injects meaning and emotion into us.

It reconnects us.

It greases the tensions, so to speak.

There is a prevailing belief that our creative life is separate from our everyday life.? That it is a place to which we can escape.

There is also a prevailing belief that the transcendent exists separate from the transactional.? That we have to ?find? or ?create? transcendent experiences somewhere away from the busyness of the ?real world?.? Again, it?s an escapist story line.

These are myths.

Our creative life exists within our everyday life.

It feeds it.

And our everyday life feeds our creative life.

They need each other.? And both suffer when they are disconnected.

Likewise, transcendence isn?t something separate from the transactional.

It is a spillover effect within it.

Think about your everyday life.

You go, go, go, go and then?

?the perfect song comes on the radio.

?an incredible conversation with someone happens.

?that bite of food you put in your mouth awakens you.

?your three-year old hugs you and says she loves you.

?that text from your husband says he?s distracted thinking about how beautiful you are.

?a random aside you caught by some biologist on some TV show last night suddenly becomes the foundational idea of a book.

One moment, we?re going about our everyday business.? The next, we are connected to a life-giving sphere that elevates us beyond space and time.

The creative is a transcendent force in our transactional lives.

We either choose to receive and use it.? Or we don?t.

What if we were catalysts for transcendence in the transactional lives of others?

That?s what I try to do through this blog.? I try to interrupt your everyday life with an idea or story or framework that elevates you.?

That reconnects you.

That transcends you.

Now get back to your day.? Because that's where the creative awaits you.

Thank you so much for reading!? I greatly enjoyed my little sabbatical from creative writing.? I am overflowing with ideas.? Let's just hope they're good!? See you tomorrow for Word-in-a-Word Wednesday.

the lucky one google april fools selena shell houston open rajon rondo office space mega millions winners

YouTube Winner Sends Spiders To Space

60-Second Science60-Second Science | Space

Amr Mohamed's winning entry in the YouTube Space Lab contest will have jumping spiders hunt in zero-gravity on the International Space Station. Mariette DiChristina reports.

More 60-Second Science

The first YouTube Space Lab contest has announced its winners. Young people entered by creating a short video of their idea for an experiment to be done in space. I was a judge.

One of the two winners, eighteen-year-old Amr Mohamed of Egypt told me about his idea to have jumping spiders hunt their prey in orbit:

?So I was reading an article about animals that have been in space, and there was the orb weavers. I thought that not all the spiders hunt the same way. Thus came the idea to send jumping spiders?they can adjust their trajectory here on earth to compensate for gravity. Well, they can realize that they don?t have to compensate for gravity anymore.?

Amr got his idea and made his video in just one day. His experiment will actually be done on the International Space Station.

AM: ?And it?s going to be the first time in history for an animal to change its way of hunting to zero-gravity environments.?

MD: ?While I was judging I saw it and I really enjoyed the idea.?

AM: ?Thank you very much.?

?Mariette DiChristina

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast]


marine corps veterans day 2011 veterans day 2011 cnbc debate family circus spanier walmart black friday ad

Memory loss with aging not necessarily permanent, animal study suggests

ScienceDaily (Apr. 2, 2012) ? Scientists from the Florida campus of The Scripps Research Institute have shown in animal models that the loss of memory that comes with aging is not necessarily a permanent thing.

In a new study published this week in an advance, online edition of the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, Ron Davis, chair of the Department of Neuroscience at Scripps Florida, and Ayako Tonoki-Yamaguchi, a research associate in Davis's lab, took a close look at memory and memory traces in the brains of both young and old fruit flies.

What they found is that like other organisms -- from mice to humans -- there is a defect that occurs in memory with aging. In the case of the fruit fly, the ability to form memories lasting a few hours (intermediate-term memory) is lost due to age-related impairment of the function of certain neurons. Intriguingly, the scientists found that stimulating those same neurons can reverse these age-related memory defects.

"This study shows that once the appropriate neurons are identified in people, in principle at least, one could potentially develop drugs to hit those neurons and rescue those memories affected by the aging process," Davis said. "In addition, the biochemistry underlying memory formation in fruit flies is remarkably conserved with that in humans so that everything we learn about memory formation in flies is likely applicable to human memory and the disorders of human memory."

While no one really understands what is altered in the brain during the aging process, in the current study the scientists were able to use functional cellular imaging to monitor the changes in the fly's neuron activity before and after learning.

"We are able to peer down into the fly brain and see changes in the brain," Davis said. "We found changes that appear to reflect how intermediate-term memory is encoded in these neurons."

Olfactory memory, which was used by the scientists, is the most widely studied form of memory in fruit flies -- basically pairing an odor with a mild electric shock. These tactics produce short-term memories that persist for around a half-hour, intermediate-term memory that lasts a few hours, and long-term memory that persists for days.

The team found that in aged animals, the signs of encoded memory were absent after a few hours. In that way, the scientists also learned exactly which neurons in the fly are altered by aging to produce intermediate-term memory impairment. This advance, Davis notes, should greatly help scientists understand how aging alters neuronal function.

Intriguingly, the scientists took the work a step further and stimulated these neurons to see if the memory could be rescued. To do this, the scientists placed either cold-activated or heat-activated ion channels in the neurons known to become defective with aging and then used cold or heat to stimulate them. In both cases, the intermediate-term memory was successfully rescued.

The study, "Aging Impairs Intermediate-Term Behavioral Memory by Disrupting the Neuron Memory Trace," was supported by the Ellison Medical Foundation and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by Scripps Research Institute, via AlphaGalileo.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Journal Reference:

  1. Ayako Tonoki and Ronald L. Davis. Aging impairs intermediate-term behavioral memory by disrupting the dorsal paired medial neuron memory trace. PNAS, April 2, 2012 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1118126109

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

kennedy assassination jfk assassination pie crust recipe heritage foundation dancing with the stars results 2011 ali fedotowsky ali fedotowsky

Darwin in the genome

Darwin in the genome [ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 3-Apr-2012
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Katherine Gombay
katherine.gombay@mcgill.ca
514-398-2189
McGill University

Research on stickleback fish shows how adaptation to new environments involves many genes

A current controversy raging in evolutionary biology is whether adaptation to new environments is the result of many genes, each of relatively small effect, or just a few genes of large effect. A new study published in Molecular Ecology strongly supports the first "many-small" hypothesis.

McGill University professor Andrew Hendry, from the Department of Biology and the Redpath Museum, and evolutionary geneticists at Basel University in Switzerland, studied how threespine stickleback fish adapted to lake and stream environments in British Columbia, Canada. The authors used cutting-edge genomic methods to test for genetic differences at thousands of positions ("loci") scattered across the stickleback genome. Very large genetic differences between lake and stream stickleback were discovered at more than a dozen of these loci, which is considerably more than expected under the alternative "few-large" hypothesis.

By examining four independently evolved lake-stream population pairs, the researchers were further able to show that increasing divergence between the populations involved genetic differences that were larger and present at more and more loci.

As these results were obtained using new high-resolution genetic methods, it is conceivable that previous perceptions of adaptation as being a genetically simple process are simply the result of a bias resulting from previous lower-resolution genomic methods.

"I suspect that as more and more studies use these methods, the tide of opinion will swerve strongly to the view that adaptation is a complex process that involves many genes spread across diverse places in the genome," says Prof. Hendry.

###


[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

?


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.


Darwin in the genome [ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 3-Apr-2012
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Katherine Gombay
katherine.gombay@mcgill.ca
514-398-2189
McGill University

Research on stickleback fish shows how adaptation to new environments involves many genes

A current controversy raging in evolutionary biology is whether adaptation to new environments is the result of many genes, each of relatively small effect, or just a few genes of large effect. A new study published in Molecular Ecology strongly supports the first "many-small" hypothesis.

McGill University professor Andrew Hendry, from the Department of Biology and the Redpath Museum, and evolutionary geneticists at Basel University in Switzerland, studied how threespine stickleback fish adapted to lake and stream environments in British Columbia, Canada. The authors used cutting-edge genomic methods to test for genetic differences at thousands of positions ("loci") scattered across the stickleback genome. Very large genetic differences between lake and stream stickleback were discovered at more than a dozen of these loci, which is considerably more than expected under the alternative "few-large" hypothesis.

By examining four independently evolved lake-stream population pairs, the researchers were further able to show that increasing divergence between the populations involved genetic differences that were larger and present at more and more loci.

As these results were obtained using new high-resolution genetic methods, it is conceivable that previous perceptions of adaptation as being a genetically simple process are simply the result of a bias resulting from previous lower-resolution genomic methods.

"I suspect that as more and more studies use these methods, the tide of opinion will swerve strongly to the view that adaptation is a complex process that involves many genes spread across diverse places in the genome," says Prof. Hendry.

###


[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

?


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.


sandusky barbados raiders chargers latin grammys latin grammys ogopogo walmart black friday

Tuesday, April 3, 2012

Garmin Approach S3 golf watch provides assistance for 27,000 courses (video)

Garmin Approach S3 golf watch gains a touchscreen, insider knowledge for 27,000 courses (video)
If you're looking for the latest dose of technology to compliment your time on the green, then take a gander at Garmin's Approach S3 golf watch. An upgrade from the Approach S1, this GPS-enabled gadget adds a touchscreen to the mix and now provides assistance for 27,000 courses across the globe. While it won't help with your swing, users will benefit from a wealth of location-based guidance such as layup distances, green overviews and precise yardages to the front, back and middle of the next green. The waterproof wristwatch offers eight hours of continuous battery life, and while its $350 retail price may deter some, it could be a wise investment should your game involve a friendly wager. Ready for more? Just hop the break for Garmin's promo video and the full PR.

Continue reading Garmin Approach S3 golf watch provides assistance for 27,000 courses (video)

Garmin Approach S3 golf watch provides assistance for 27,000 courses (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 03 Apr 2012 07:00:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

at last al green burger king delivery etta james at last john king obama sings al green heidi klum and seal